Hate Free Zone

Hate Free Zone
This is a Hate Free Zone

Admonishes

The Bible contains six admonishments to homosexuals and 362 admonishments to heterosexuals. That doesn't mean that God doesn't love heterosexuals. It's just that they need more supervision. ~Lynn Lavner

Monday, November 4, 2013

Straight Marine Attacked For Defending His Gay Friends

Hero alert! After attending a drag show on Sunday night, a straight marine got his face beaten (and not in the fun way) for defending two of his gay friends.Corporal Ryan Langenegger, 22, was grabbing a late-night bite with two gay guys —one of whom was dressed in drag — when a homophobic meathead approached their table at Pepperjax Bar and Grill in Omaha, Nebraska, and began harassing them.

“We were eating and there was three guys watching us,” Langenegger told WOWT 6 News. “And one of them stepped up and was a foot or two away from my friend and he just kept saying, ‘Should I? Should I?’”
To avoid further conflict, Langenegger and his two friends — Joshua Foo, 29, and Jacob Gellinger, 25 — decided to walk away. But the homophobes pursued them and blocked their exit. According to Langenegger, Gellinger said to the men, “Yes, I know, I’m a boy in a dress,” to which one of the men reportedly responded, “Yes, I know. And you’re (expletive) disgusting.”

At that point, Langenegger verbally tried to diffuse the situation. That’s when he got punched in the face. He suffered a gash on his forehead and two chipped teeth as a result of the blow. (And since this is a serious crime, we will refrain from talking about the fact that Langenegger is gorgeous, even with the scars.)

The group filed a police report, but their attackers already had left by the time the cops arrived. Few other details about the investigation are available at this time.
“It just makes no sense this day and age and in Omaha, for all of this stuff to still be happening and out in the streets,” Langenegger said.

On Saturday, a gay rights group will host a rally in Omaha to call attention to homophobia and hate crimes in the area. Organizing the event is a local drag queen named Chad Bugge, whose performs under the stage name Anna Roxia. Sorry haters, but gay people are the best.

P.S. You may be thinking/hoping Langenegger is a closet case. We visited his Facebook page, and we’re pretty positive he’s not lying. Among his likes: Megan Fox, Incubus and Mitt Romney. What can you do? Nobody’s perfect.

Re-blogged from: http://www.Queerty.com.  So you can understand the obviously gay based writing done here. What do I mean. Well they talk about him being gorgeous and straight.

To All My friends from about: me and the rest of the internet...

Dear friends who have come to look at my rather lame blog... First off... thank  you for taking a peek. When I first started this blog, I had all kinds of classic gay porn on it. I thought it was a nice blog, until my brother found it. I thought for sure he was going to have a stroke. He is straight first off. I don't hold that against him, but he went wild and involved others in my family. So in a fit of anger I destroyed my old blog and put up this blog. Mostly resposts of things in the gay community I have found of interest.

Does that mean I have lost interest in gay porn? Not but in deference to my family I will not post those types of photos unless they relate to a story I am doing here.


And having said that I am on a hunt, a mystery of a man who was seen in many gay porn magazines from the mid 1960's to the mid 1970's and then suddenly for some unknown reason he just disappeared off the face of the gay porn scene.

Name:  Sean Patrik
Photographer: Mel Roberts

Now Mel was well know for his magazines of young fit and legal men in the nude.

Sean had been posing for Mel for a few years but always clothed because he was underage. In 1968 he turned 18 and began posing in the nude for Mel.




I am sure you can tell that the wait was worth it. Sean was a very well developed young man. And he was also extremely well endowed.  But there is literally nothing concerning his career in print or on the internet. Just a few articles of people trying to find out what happened to this young man.

Today in 2013 he would be 63 years of age. A grandfather possibly. That is assuming he is still alive. Many of those young men had their issues, dealing from alcohol and drug abuses, to social diseases. Keeping in mind this was before HIV and AIDS. As we know nothing of Sean and what he did or did not go through it hard to write a sensible article about him.

So I come to the gay community to find out what you all know. Maybe you can dig into your chest of classic gay pornography and see if you can find any articles about Sean. Keep in mind that this was the start of the "California Boy - All American Boy" time frame. And he was one of the stars of that time.





 And again, the purpose is to find out what happened to him. He is among the large number of young men who participated in a growing and exciting time for gay American men. And while the gay pride movement and other such out events were still in our future. Men like him took pride in their appearance and chose to share that with many of us.

Hopefully the story is good. By that I mean I hope that Sean has led and is leading a good life now. And that he only did this for a side line to raise some extra money for what ever he needed money for. But again, we don't know what happened to this attractive California Boy.

Please help me find out. You can message me here at the blog if you have any information. I'd be gratefully appreciative.

And to my About Me: followers - About me: is a new social format for me, I try to message back when I can. But sometimes I forget and for that I am sorry. But to you all thanks for understanding and support what I do....

Saturday, September 21, 2013

Renaming of gay marriage leave is 'no fix,' senator says

 

Petty Officer 2nd Class Jerrel Revels, left, proposes to his boyfriend Dylan Kirchner during the homecoming of the USS New Mexico at the submarine base in Groton, Conn., on Aug. 12, 2013, after the ship's inaugural six-month deployment.

Kristina Young/U.S. Navy

 

A revised Defense Department policy intended to quell criticism of its August announcement of up to 10 days uncharged marriage leave to gay and lesbian service members assigned where they can’t legally marry fails to “fix” the issue of giving same-sex couples a special benefit, says Sen. Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Service Committee.

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel notified Inhofe in a Sept. 6 letter that, given the senator’s concerns, Hagel had met with service secretaries and the Joint Chiefs to review the issue. Based on those discussions, Hagel told Inhofe, Jessica L. Wright, acting undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, had issued “clarifying guidance” to the services.

The “marriage leave” provision previously inserted in the DOD Instruction 1327.06 on “Leave and Liberty Policy and Procedures” was removed. Instead, language was inserted that allows the services to grant “administrative absences” to any member wishing to marry who is assigned more than 100 miles away from an area where they legally can marry.

Hagel said the revised policy also addresses Inhofe’s concern that the department lacks authority to grant uncharged leave. This won’t be leave.

“There is long-standing precedent that commanders have discretionary authority to grant liberty to service members. An administrative absence to obtain a legal marriage falls within this authority,” Hagel wrote.

“This clarification reinforces the department's commitment to treat all men and women who serve our country and their families equally,” Hagel wrote. “It will ensure that military benefits will be available to all military spouses, regardless of whether they are in same-sex or opposite-sex marriages.”

In a written statement, which an aide provided to Stars and Strips, Military Update, Inhofe called Hagel’s response “a disappointment.”

“The department's decision to cancel the uncharged leave benefit and substitute an ‘administrative absence’ provision did not fix the issue at hand. Not only does the Secretary fail to disclose his authority to create this administrative leave benefit but it still violates their own expressed policy…that they will ‘treat all military personnel equally.’ ”

Inhofe said he didn’t know of a situation in which heterosexual members would be eligible for administrative absence, presumably because they legally can marry in any state and overseas areas too. Indeed, a spokesman for Wright could not provide an example of a situation where a heterosexual member might be granted administrative absence to marry.

“I would refer you to the various states (and/or countries) who can discuss the specifics of their laws,” Lt. Cmdr. Nate Christensen responded in an email. “From the Department's perspective, this policy simply recognizes that there are differences among the states regarding marriage qualifications and those differences sometimes work a hardship on military personnel.”

Do any heterosexual members face such hardships? He couldn’t say.

The aide to Inhofe said the senator “has heard from many military members who believe” their 30 days’ annual leave is sufficient to accommodate any marriage travel “no matter the member’s orientation.”

The Senate Armed Services Committee will hold a confirmation hearing September 19 on several senior defense executives including Wright who is nominated to become undersecretary of defense. She is expected to face questions on this policy from Inhofe and other conservatives.

“Eligible service members assigned within the Continental United States may be granted an administrative absence for a period of up to 7 days. Those assigned outside the Continental United States may be granted an administrative absence for a period of up to 10 days,” Hagel explained.

Wright’s Sept. 4 memo does provide the services more detailed and restrictive guidance on how many days of absence they should grant to members unable to marry within 100 miles of current assignments. The number should depend on two factors.

One is the waiting period that a state or jurisdiction requires either to obtain a marriage license or, after obtaining a license, the wait required before a couple can marry. A second factor is travel time to and from a jurisdiction that allows the marriage. A maximum of two days’ travel is authorized if a member is in the continental United States; a maximum of five days’ travel is authorized if a member is assigned outside of the Continental United States (CONUS).

Commands are to calculate days of administrative absences based not on where members want to marry but on the nearest jurisdictions where they can marry. Wright provides this example:

“A service member is assigned in CONUS to a duty station 150 miles from the closest jurisdiction that can grant a legal marriage. That jurisdiction requires a three-day waiting period. However, the member desires to travel 500 miles to a state [that] requires a five-day waiting period to obtain a legal marriage. The member may be granted administrative absence of four days – one day for travel (one-half day each way) and three days for the required waiting period.”

If two service members are the couple wishing to marry, both may be granted extra days off and also can use earned leave in association with administrative absences to extend the length of their marriage trips.

Stephen L. Peters, president of American Military Partner Association, endorsed Wright’s clarifying memo, saying: “In effect, nothing has changed. Avoiding references to sexual orientation is completely acceptable and is a practical approach that silences the arguments of the critics.”

The policy remains “an answer to the inequality that same-gender military couples face who are stationed in states that deny them the ability to marry, thereby denying them the ability to access military support and benefits in order to care for their family and focus on the mission first.”

Heterosexuals won’t benefit, Peters conceded, because they already can marry anywhere, “which is the fundamental point of the policy.”

(Re-posted from Stars and Stripes newspaper © 2013 All rights reserved)

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

I need your help!

 


I have had this blog on and off for quite a while. And now I need my readers help. Here is my problem. I don't think that I am really providing a service to the LGBT community with what I am putting on here. 99% is reblogged articles from other sites. And none of it really has anything to do with Muskegon.

I love Muskegon, and the gay men and women who live here. We are a strong group of people. We have jobs, and raise our kids, and keep our houses up. The only difference between us and the rest of the world is the people we love. And the fact that we are often discriminated against by the rest of the world.


So I am asking a simple question to all my readers:  What do you think I could do to make this blog more relevant and better? If you could leave your answers in the comments section I will read them and take them under consideration and regardless of what is said I will publish them. I want to make this blog something that is good for all our people.



In the beginning I thought people wanted to see old pornongraphy. And so I posted a lot of pictures I found on the internet. They were the most read things on the blog. There wasn't much of an article associated with them. And then my brother, who is straight, found my blog. And all hell broke loose. This was the main reason I shut the blog down. But I started to think that maybe, just maybe I had missed the point of this blog. Gay and proud in Muskegon. Okay I know why I am gay, but what am I proud of as it relates to Muskegon and being gay? So I restarted the blog with a better understanding of what I wanted to accomplish.



So I am beginning to search out the real gay Muskegon. What happens here in Muskegon. Yes the parties, the fun, but also the reality of being gay in this society. I will reblog some articles but I think maybe I need to write more original material. But I need you guy's help. And you don't have to be a resident of Muskegon to participate.

What makes San Francisco the home base for gays in America? Why can't Muskegon, if not be a home base, be a popular stop on the gay parade like Saugatuck used to be? Help me find the answers and along the way we might even have some fun. That rainbow flag hasta stand for something doesn't it?




Monday, August 19, 2013

Nudism numbers in America drop, younger nudists going it alone

http://www.digitaljournal.com/img/5/1/6/1/1/2/i/7/9/1/p-medium/800px-Monta_Beach_5005c.JPG   
By Marcus Hondro
Aug 15, 2013 in Lifestyle
Re-blogged from:  Digital Journal - All Rights Reserved (c) 2013

           A spokesman for the American Assoc. for Nude Recreation, Tom Mulhall, told media last week the AANR's numbers are shrinking. The association once had 50,000 plus but in recent years have dropped to 35,000.

         The solution? Trying to get younger by convincing young nudist to join their more formal nudist organizations. It's not simply to have more naked people wandering around their clubs, Mulhall says, but to ensure the future of nudism. "Our reaching out to young people is being done, in part, to expand nudists' rights," Mulhall recently told NBC News. "For example, this year they closed Lighthouse Beach (on Long Island) for nude use. We're saying: If you want to protect nude beaches so that when you're older you can enjoy them, you've got to join the movement, too." Youthful nudists form YNA

         One problem appears to be that some younger nudists do not feel so welcome in nudists resorts peopled by the older nudists and many have complained that older nudists are not receptive to them. An example of a point of friction is that many nudist resorts don't welcome nudists who engage in genital piercings, prevalent among the young.

         Further, the more youthful nudists feel comfortable being naked in less-formal venues, such as remote trails and lakes and on nude beaches in or near cities like Wreck Beach in Vancouver, Canada. They don't need formal venues to be naked. Where does this leave the future of nudism in North America? The naked truth is nudism is not dying off, not without a fight.

        The Young Naturists and Nudists America (YNA) is a club that has 300 members and growing so whether young nudists embrace the established nudism resorts, there is a growing movement for them. Being naked around a bonfire, on a beach, or poolside in a more formal setting isn't about to go away anytime soon, just ask YNA co-founder, Felicity Jones. She says that it's about a lifestyle that is positive and that will continue to thrive. "We're trying to teach people how to be more human," she said.


Thursday, July 25, 2013

The truth about falling in love…….

RainbowSometimes I write things in here well that really sound stupid. But here is something I hope that while you might think is not so stupid that it wastes your time while you are reading it. I want to be loved. Does that really sound so bad?
     When I came out, I thought I had to make up for lost time. I was 36 years old and felt that I had wasted my time. I was technically still a virgin.  
     Nobody, every made love to me the way you do when you are about to lose your virginity. Now I had read up on the topic. Gay sex that is, not just anal sex.
     And it seemed so mechanical. So, as a matter of fact. What I failed to recognize, and I think a lot of gay men do is that there are two different types of sex. There is just having sex, with no romantic invovlement, and making love. Now I won’t go into a lot about just having sex. We all know it’s a rather mechanical process. And frankly I love it. The different types of feelings that I feel, and the different types of feeling I can get the other person to feel. But it’s all rather physical and impersonal. Two guys meet on the internet and after a number of chats, maybe exchanging face pictures, and then nude ones, you decide to meet.
     Now this tends to bring on other problems, can you host, I have a wife, are you ddf (disease and drug free) and what is you HIV status. And do you believe his answers? What about going bareback with a stranger. I once had a man that I was playing with tell me that he had only gone bareback with one guy. This was the guy he thought was going to be his lover and partner for the rest of his life. Now talk about a matter of trust.
     When all of those items have been settled and if you are lucky enough to get a first name, you meet. And most often, at least in my experience, the guy comes over and he wants to get right to it. So we end up in the bedroom stripping off our clothes as fast as we can. And if we are lucky, one of the two will already have a hard-on and want a blow job. Meanwhile, while the two of them are going at it, the host has a whole list of things going through his mind. “Okay, condoms on the night stand, lube in the tube by the pillow, and the dry washcloth to clean up with… check check and check.”
     By the time he has run through his list, the other guy has blown his nut in your ass. Wiped his dick on your underwear, is dressed and gone, while you lay their and cum dump on your brand new 400 thread Egyptian cotton sheets.  You jump in the shower to clean up and while you are in there you are trying to come to terms with what just happened. No condom, no romance, just up, in and bang. I turn my head and he’s gone. No thanks, no “gee that was fun.” Just out the door.
     That’s just having sex. But romance takes a lot more effort and planning. You finally have found someone who doesn’t find you over-weight, less endowed than he likes, and doesn’t fart after being fucked. He wants to spend time with you, doing things you like to do, and not just in the bedroom. He wants your time together to be something special. He WANTS TO DATE ME?
     When the time comes he asks you to be his man, to go exclusive. And you jump on that chance. A chance to be loved for who you are and not what hangs between your legs.  The relationship, like all relationships, has it’s ups and downs. But he really seems to be into you. You celebrate the holidays together and agonize about presents for him. You have dinners together and go to the movies until finally that one night when he wants you to spend it with him. Alone, together, in his bed. Making love. It’s such a total investment in my life, I am afraid. I don’t want it to end, and I am just afraid I might say or do something to spoil it. I act like that innocent 18 year old virgin boy again. Will he like what I have to offer. And I don’t just mean what’s between my legs. What will he expect me to do. Am I being to aggressive or to submissive. Oh God, I so don’t want to screw this up.
     He looks at me with those big beautiful brown eyes. He as that slight smile on his face and I just let him take me, body and soul. And for that night, I am forever his. And the sex is better than any of those porn movies can portray. And when the sex is all over, laying next to him, in his arms. I hear him breath and feel his heart beat against my cheek as my face rests on his chest. I am his now and forever.
     Now this is just a story. We know that these things can and do happen all the time. But what is not stated are the negative things that come along with an exclusive relationship. Sometimes it’s jealousy. You see him with another man and you have no clue what is going on. You begin to learn things about him that you don’t really like. You don’t hate him for those things but you wonder how you could of missed them before. It has been almost a year since we met. And don’t think for a moment he isn’t having the exact same thoughts and feelings about you.
     But you have to ask yourself if you think that it’s all worth it? And if the answer is yes, then go for it. 100%. Don’t give up or give in. Relationships, in general, require a ton of hard grueling work to be successful. And there will always be bumps in the road. When I talk to couples who have been together for a long time, they almost say to a couple that, compromise is the biggest tool in a successful relationship. I can’t deny that. I can however only hope to see it when my time comes.
Red heart

Saturday, July 20, 2013

Time for Some Fun! - The Royal Rump.

    Well last time around on my blog, I caught a fair bit of wind for putting the classic boys from the 1960's and 1970's on here. Suddenly, it became a gross and not very nice blog. Well that's what my family thought. So when I restarted this one I decided that a million pictures of twinks engaged in rather gay pursuits will never grace this blog again. This is out of respect for my family and anyone else who just doesn't get me.
However, by the title of this post I wish to show and discuss the backside of sexy men. Yes MEN of legal age. So fair warning, if this type post offends you then please PLEASE, leave. But like I said we will keep the old porn and erect penises out of this and just pursue the cute bum.

Tanned and dimples
    The bottom, buttocks, butt, ass, poop chute, what ever you want to call it, we all have one, and it is not defined by gender or sexual orientation. Even though gay men might perceive it that way. When we have a chance to view it, it is an amazing part of our bodies.   When we are young, it's found to be very taut and firm, and has it's own set of dimple attached to it. If we are lucky to be out in the sun, we might even have a nice tan (no tan lines ha ha).

And a lot of the time we like to show off for our friends in "unique" and well let's face it strange ways.

Just Call me a Tree Hugger.


From out in the forest, where one has a sense of privacy and anonymity. To the local public toilet where the chance of getting caught just excites the people even more.
 
So they aren't really worried about their bums are they?


Being naked and reading a magazine
But regardless, showing your bottom in public, I think can be less dangerous if you are a group and totally drunk and having the time of your life.

Watching someone at the nude beach or just horsing around, you begin to see and understand the complexities, as well as the sheer beauty of the human body.

And when its hot... to the lake

 And for that, we all should truly be thankful.


Posing in the Studio

 What I think many of us have to be concerned about is being obsessive over the "perfect body". There truly is no such thing. Models work hard in the gym for their bodies. And really do want to have something to show a person. The average John Q. Public can look good as well, so long as he remembers that how his body looks must not define how he feels as a person.

And so as we get closer to the end of this post, I ask the general reading audience what they think about their ass. I mean for some of us older men, it's kinda flabbed out and is drooping, for others, "it's no big deal a cushion for when I sit to unload." So just let me know what you think. Was this post a waste of time?  Or did you really get my meaning? Either way, enjoy your summer and enjoy the sun.


Changing for the party.

It's a part of me!

I hope he/she likes it.





















Friday, June 28, 2013

Supreme Court: DOMA Decision Rules Federal Same-Sex Marriage Ban Unconstitutional






WASHINGTON -- The Defense of Marriage Act, the law barring the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages legalized by the states, is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday by a 5-4 vote.


"The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and to injure those whom the State, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion. "By seeking to displace this protection and treating those persons as living in marriages less respected than others, the federal statute is in violation of the Fifth Amendment."


Justice Kennedy delivered the court’s opinion, and was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito all filed dissenting opinions. Justice Clarence Thomas joined Scalia's dissent in whole and parts of Alito's opinion.


As Kennedy read the majority opinion from the bench, cries were heard in the courtroom when the justice delivered the verdict that DOMA violates the Fifth Amendment. A number of same-sex couples sitting in the audience looked up at the ceiling, while others wiped away tears.


DOMA, signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996, prevented same-sex couples whose marriages were recognized by their home state from receiving the hundreds of benefits available to other married couples under federal law. During the Obama administration, the Justice Department initially defended DOMA in court despite the administration’s desire to repeal it. But the Justice Department changed course in early 2011, finding that the law was unconstitutional and declining to defend it any longer. (The majority opinion slightly criticized that decision on Wednesday, writing that the "failure to defend the constitutionality of an Act of Congress based on a constitutional theory not yet established in judicial decisions" had "created a procedural dilemma.") House Republicans have since spent hundreds of thousands of dollars taking over that defense.


Plaintiff Edie Windsor, 84, sued the federal government after the Internal Revenue Service denied her refund request for the $363,000 in federal estate taxes she paid after her spouse, Thea Spyer, died in 2009.

During the March oral arguments in United States v. Windsor, a majority of the court seemed to express doubts about the constitutionality of DOMA. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that supporters of the law seemed to want "two types of marriage," likening same-sex unions to the "skim milk" version of marriage.

On Wednesday, the court’s majority ruled that the power of the individual state in defining marriage "is of central relevance" and the decision to grant same-sex couples the right to marry is "of immense import." The state, the court ruled, "used its historic and essential authority to define the marital relation in this way, its role and its power in making the decision enhanced the recognition, dignity, and protection of the class in their own community." The court held that DOMA "because of its reach and extent, departs from this history and tradition of reliance on state law to define marriage."


DOMAs "demonstrated purpose is to ensure that if any State decides to recognize same-sex marriages, those unions will be treated as second-class marriages for purposes of federal law," the majority ruled. "This raises a most serious question under the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment." DOMA, the majority said, "humiliates tens of thousands of children now being raised by same-sex couples" and "makes it even more difficult for the children to understand the integrity and closeness of their own family and its concord with other families in their community and in their daily lives."


Roberts, in his written dissent, said he "would not tar the political branches with the brush of bigotry" without "more convincing evidence that the Act’s principal purpose was to codify malice." He said he believed Congress acted constitutionally when it passed legislation to "retain the definition of marriage that, at that point, had been adopted by every State in our Nation, and every nation in the world."

Scalia delivered his dissent from the bench. "In the majority’s telling," he said, "this story is black-and-white: hate your neighbor or come along with us. The truth is more complicated. It is hard to admit that one’s political opponents are not monsters, especially in a struggle like this one, and the challenge in the end proves more than today’s Court can handle. Too bad."


Some, Scalia said, "will rejoice in today’s decision, and some will despair at it, that is the nature of a controversy that matters so much to so many. But the Court has cheated both sides, robbing the winners of an honest victory, and the losers of the peace that comes from a fair defeat. We owed both of them better."

In his written dissent, Scalia declared that the Constitution "neither requires nor forbids our society to approve of same-sex marriage, much as it neither requires nor forbids us to approve of no-fault divorce, polygamy, or the consumption of alcohol." The majority’s opinion, he wrote, declares "open season on any law that (in the opinion of the law’s opponents and any panel of like-minded federal judges) can be characterized as mean-spirited."


One of the same-sex couples whose eyes had glistened with tears just moments before chuckled to themselves as Scalia spoke, rolling their eyes when he noted that the majority had characterized DOMA supporters as "unhinged members of a wild-eyed lynch mob."

But Scalia argued the majority's decision "aggrandizes" the Supreme Court for little other purpose than "to buy a stolen moment in the spotlight."


After concluding his dissent, Scalia prepared to deliver the verdict in Sekhar v. United States, a comparatively obscure case questioning whether an attorney's recommendation can be the subject of an extortion attempt under the federal Hobbs Act.


"I'm sorry about that, but this is short," he joked.


The room erupted in laughter, and the court moved on to its next case.


Shortly after DOMA was struck down, President Barack Obama released a statement celebrating the decision. "This was discrimination enshrined in law. It treated loving, committed gay and lesbian couples as a separate and lesser class of people. The Supreme Court has righted that wrong, and our country is better off for it," he said.

(c) 2013 The Huffington Post - All Rights Reserved

Bloggers Comments:  The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) in a 5-4 decision struck down the Defense of Marriage Act as being unconstitutional. I am re-blogging  the Huffington Post's coverage of this great event. We must remember, however, that this is just one battle in the war of equality. And until the war has been won, let us not allow ourselves to be lessened by any one successful battle.

The claim that SCOUTUS is legislating from the bench is really not true. The Supreme Court's main job is to ensure that America's laws are abiding by the overall constitution of our country. So this decision was in keeping with the purpose of the Supreme Court, whether it was a unanimous decision or a split decision.

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Gay ‘Conversion Therapy’ Faces Test in Courts




Gay “conversion therapy,” which claims to help men overcome unwanted same-sex attractions but has been widely attacked as unscientific and harmful, is facing its first tests in the courtroom.
“Saying the abuse made you gay is terrible. Once I accepted that I was gay, I was able to focus on the more serious problem of a history of sex abuse.” 

“I was encouraged to develop anger and rage toward my parents. The notion that your parents caused this is a horrible lie.” 

In New Jersey on Tuesday, four gay men who tried the therapy filed a civil suit against a prominent counseling group, charging it with deceptive practices under the state’s Consumer Fraud Act. 

The former clients said they were emotionally scarred by false promises of inner transformation and humiliating techniques that included stripping naked in front of the counselor and beating effigies of their mothers. They paid thousands of dollars in fees over time, they said, only to be told that the lack of change in their sexual feelings was their own fault. 

In California, so-called ex-gay therapists have gone to court to argue for the other side. They are seeking to block a new state law, signed by Gov. Jerry Brown in September and celebrated as a milestone by advocates for gay rights, that bans conversion therapy for minors. 

In Sacramento on Friday, a federal judge will hear the first of two legal challenges brought by conservative law groups claiming that the ban is an unconstitutional infringement on speech, religion and privacy. 

Since the 1970s, when mainstream mental health associations stopped branding homosexuality as a disorder, a small network of renegade therapists, conservative religious leaders and self-identified “life coaches” has continued to argue that it is not inborn, but an aberration rooted in childhood trauma. Homosexuality is caused, these therapists say, by a stifling of normal masculine development, often by distant fathers and overbearing mothers or by early sexual abuse. 

An industry of “reparative therapy” clinics and men's weekend retreats has drawn thousands of teenagers and adults who hope to rid themselves of homosexual urges, whether because of religious beliefs or family pressures. 

But leading scientific and medical groups say that the theories of sexuality are unfounded and that there is no evidence that core sexual urges can be changed. They also warn that the therapy can, in the words of the American Psychiatric Association, cause “depression, anxiety and self-destructive behavior” and “reinforce self-hatred already experienced by the patient.” 

Those conclusions will be at the center of the coming legal fights in the state and federal courts.
In the spotlight in New Jersey are a counseling center called Jews Offering New Alternatives for Healing, or Jonah; its co-founder Arthur Goldberg; and an affiliated “life coach,” Alan Downing. 

Mr. Goldberg helped found Jonah in 1999, after he finished serving a prison sentence and probation for financial fraud he committed in the 1980s. The group describes itself as “dedicated to educating the worldwide Jewish community about the social, cultural and emotional factors that lead to same-sex attractions,” and says it “works directly with those struggling with unwanted same-sex attractions,” including non-Jews. 

While many Orthodox Jews consider homosexual relations to be a violation of divine law, Mr. Goldberg’s group has no official standing within Judaism, and many Jews accept homosexuality.
Neither Mr. Goldberg nor Mr. Downing is licensed as a therapist, so they are not subject to censure by professional associations. 

The Southern Poverty Law Center, a rights group based in Montgomery, Ala., is bringing the suit on behalf of four former patients and two of their mothers, who say they paid thousands of dollars not only for useless therapy for their sons but also for more counseling to undo the damage. 

“The defendants peddled anti-gay pseudoscience, defaming gay people as loathsome and deranged,” said Sam Wolfe, a lawyer with the group. 

The suit, filed in Superior Court in Hudson County, calls for monetary compensation and for a shutdown of Jonah. 

Mr. Goldberg and Mr. Downing did not respond to telephone and e-mail requests for comment.

  One former patient in the suit, Michael Ferguson, 30, who is now a doctoral candidate in neuroscience at the University of Utah, sought help from Jonah in 2008. He tried to battle his homosexuality, he said, when he was a practicing Mormon who believed that only those in a heterosexual marriage could achieve eternal bliss.

Mr. Ferguson attended a retreat called Journey Into Manhood, where he shared what he called his “dark secret” with 40 other men. To be accepted among men who were also struggling with homosexuality was euphoric, he said, but that temporary high was not the promised first step toward becoming heterosexual.

After months of $100 therapy sessions with Mr. Downing at Jonah’s offices in Jersey City, and after suffering from depression that led him to see a licensed psychotherapist elsewhere, Mr. Ferguson said, he realized that he was not changing. 

“It becomes fraudulent, even cruel,” he said in an interview. “To say that if you really want to change you could — that’s an awful thing to tell somebody.” 

“I was encouraged to develop anger and rage toward my parents,” he added. “The notion that your parents caused this is a horrible lie. They ask you to blame your mother for being loving and wonderful.”
Another former patient in the suit, Chaim Levin, 23, grew up in an Orthodox Jewish community in Brooklyn where, he said, being gay seemed unthinkable. 

Referred to Jonah by a rabbi when he was 18, Mr. Levin began attending weekend retreats at $650 each. For a year and a half, he had weekly private sessions with Mr. Downing as well as weekly group sessions.

He quit, he said, after Mr. Downing had him remove his clothes and touch himself, saying it would help him reconnect with his masculinity. Mr. Goldberg has defended Mr. Downing’s methods as sometimes appropriate for men dealing with body image problems. 

But Mr. Levin called the episode “degrading and humiliating.” 

Mr. Levin said that he was sexually abused by a relative between the ages of 6 and 10 and that Mr. Goldberg and Mr. Downing blamed the abuse for his homosexual attractions. “Saying the abuse made you gay is terrible,” Mr. Levin said. “Once I accepted that I was gay, I was able to focus on the more serious problem of a history of sex abuse.” 

Many of the same issues surrounding conversion therapy will be argued before federal judges in California as therapists, some represented by Liberty Counsel and others by the Pacific Justice Institute, seek to prevent the state ban from taking effect in January. 

Responding to the accusations of constitutional violations, a brief by the California attorney general’s office cited the extensive professional literature that discredits conversion therapy and said the new law barred harmful conduct but not speech or religion. Since the ban applies only to licensed therapists, religious counselors will not be affected. 

Erwin Chemerinsky, a constitutional expert and dean of the law school at the University of California, Irvine, said, “The law is clear that the government can prohibit health care practices that are harmful or ineffective.”
If the court accepts the scientific evaluation put forward by the state, he said, “the government is likely to prevail in the end.”

Bloggers Comments: This article I posted here was in response to a multiple court cases now coming to the court room dealing with reparative therapies. I am always amazed at how people on the religious right can think that I decided one day to wake up and choose to be a member of one of the most hated minorities on the planet. It just totally blows my mind when they say that God hates me because of who I am. How do they really know God's thoughts on the matter. It is not really mentioned in the bible in the way these people would want us to believe. And on top of all this, they claim that they can "change" a person back to being heterosexual as if the person ever started out that way. I think Governor Brown's law in California protecting teenage gays and lesbians in not a violation of the Constitution. Those are just my opinions. Nobody elses.

Sunday, June 2, 2013

Rev. Gary Meier, Gay Catholic Priest, Comes Out To An Uncertain Future

Posted:




By Tim Townsend
St. Louis Post-Dispatch


ST. LOUIS (RNS) On the campus of the University of Missouri-St. Louis, the Rev. Gary Meier addressed a congregation of sorts – people who wanted to hear what the Roman Catholic priest had been thinking since, nearly a year ago, he last stood before a flock.

That was last June, when Meier told his parishioners at Saints Teresa and Bridget Church in north St. Louis that he would take a leave of absence “to discern what ministry God was calling me to do.”

Meier, 49, had told his archbishop that he could no longer teach the Catholic church’s stance on homosexuality.

“I have tried over the years to reconcile my silence as a gay priest with that of the Church’s increasingly anti-gay stance. I have been unsuccessful,” Meier writes in his book “Hidden Voices: Reflections of a Gay, Catholic Priest.”

“I was hopeful that I could find a way to have integrity while remaining part of a hierarchy that is anti-gay — I was unsuccessful.”

Meier originally published the book anonymously in 2011. But last week, he republished it with his own name on the cover. He’s now studying for a master’s degree in counseling at UMSL.

Since his public declaration of his sexual orientation, he has received much support on his Facebook page, Meier told his UMSL audience of 80 or so parishioners, priests, former priests and gay-rights activists. One woman, though, scolded him for accusing the church of a “lack of love.”

“That’s not at all what I’m saying,” said Meier. “But I am accusing the church of a lack of tolerance and acceptance.”

In doing so, he is risking his priesthood, while also drawing attention to the church’s stance on homosexuality and gay priests.

Priests in active ministry rarely state their sexual orientation, in part because it’s supposed to be beside the point for men who have taken lifetime vows of celibacy. The Rev. James Martin, a Jesuit priest and editor-at-large at America magazine, says there are only two or three priests in the U.S. who have said publicly that they are homosexual.

“There are hundreds, if not thousands, of celibate gay priests working in the Catholic church today who are beloved by their parishioners,” Martin said. “And there are a number of reasons why almost all of them feel unable to be honest. They are either uncomfortable themselves, or they’re told specifically by their superiors not to talk about it.”

Meier’s decision to go public came, he said, after watching the church’s position harden over the last decade.

“My position is that our teaching is causing harm,” he said in an interview.

The church does not have an official position on gay priests, but bishops in the past have mostly argued that celibacy is celibacy and a good priest is a good priest.

In 2005, the Vatican issued new guidelines barring men with “deep-seated homosexual tendencies” from being considered for the priesthood. In 2009, a Vatican probe of U.S. seminaries that was ordered after the clergy sex abuse scandal concluded that “difficulties” related to “homosexual behavior” have been largely “overcome.”

The catechism of the Roman Catholic Church calls homosexual acts “acts of grave depravity” and “intrinsically disordered” because they “close the sexual act to the gift of life.” But the catechism also says that homosexuals “must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity.”

Speaking at UMSL, he said he believed the bishops’ teaching on homosexuality had been a contributing factor in growing suicide rates among gay teenagers.

“We ought to own some of that,” he said. “The church’s hard line against homosexuality causes that kind of damage.”

The St. Louis Archdiocese did not respond to a request for comment about Meier’s book, but Archbishop Robert Carlson released a statement saying that Meier, “as a man who experiences same-sex attraction,” had “an opportunity to be an example and mentor to Catholics in the archdiocese who struggle with the same feelings.”

“Whether he will seize this opportunity to proclaim the Gospel of Life, which offers the truth about the beauty and sanctity of human sexuality, is entirely within his control,” Carlson said.

Meier, who recently celebrated the 15th anniversary of his ordination, said his sexuality had never been a secret to his family and friends. He said that when he was interviewed during the screening process at Kenrick Seminary, he answered truthfully to the six interviewers (of nine, total) who asked about his sexual orientation and history. When they asked him if he believed he could be celibate, he answered, “I think so.”

The priest now says that his only relationship is “with the people of God,” and that he’s been faithful to his vows. “Celibacy is a rule the church imposes on its clergy. It’s always part of the package,” he said. “This is not about celibacy.”

The question for Meier — the question all his friends and family have been asking since he put his name on the book’s cover — is, “What now?”

Meier said he would like to remain a priest, but he knows that’s unlikely.

“To be a priest and active in ministry, you can’t say what I’m saying,” he said in answer to a question at the UMSL event. “I don’t think I’ll be getting any more paychecks from the archdiocese.”

The Rev. John Beal, a professor of canon law at the Catholic University of America, said that if a priest rejected the idea that “homosexual acts are gravely immoral, that would be a reason they can’t continue in ministry, because they’re dissenting from the teaching of the church.”

If Carlson finds anything in Meier’s book that contradicts church teaching, Meier could be suspended from ministry, and his license to act as a Catholic priest could be removed.

Meier already has, in essence, removed himself from ministry. In an act of solidarity with gay Catholics against the church’s teaching, he has refrained from administering the sacraments since taking a leave of absence. Recently he elected not to celebrate his aunt’s funeral Mass.

In his book, Meier said he had to go public as a matter of personal integrity.

“I see my speaking out as an act of love toward a community which was born of God’s radical inclusivity,” he wrote.

11-Year-Old vs. Anti-Gay Politician

Eleven-year-old Marcel has had enough of the anti-gay politicians in his state. The queer youngster from Tennessee wrote an op-ed for Huffington Post railing against John Ragan, a  state house representative. He is the co-sponsor of a bill requiring teachers to out gay students to parents.


“John Ragan’s Classroom Protection Act will do harm to LGBT students across the state,” Marcel writes. “It promotes a system that does not educate students about gays, because no one but counselors, nurses and principals can talk about being gay. This also means that if a student were to talk to a teacher about being bullied because he or she is gay or possibly gay, the teacher would be required to say something like, "That subject is inappropriate for your age group."’ He wonders how such a politician can be considered an advocate for school children. About a year ago a nonprofit called StudentsFirst named Ragan a ‘reformer of the year.’

“I am against a man receiving an award for trying to destroy all safe places for LGBT students,” Marcel maintains. “John Ragan is receiving his honor from StudentsFirst, whose actions are contrary to their name.”  Marcel is sponsoring a petition asking StudentsFirst to withdraw the award.

This academic year Marcel was taught at home due to the severe bullying he sustained the year before. “During my first year in middle school, I experienced severe bullying,” the middle-schooler writes. “I was called terrible names that were quite hurtful. At that time, I had just realized that I’m gay, and the bullies used the word "gay" as an insult. This made me feel like being gay was horrible, but my parents told me otherwise. Their support was tremendous. But as powerful as their love was, it couldn’t fight off all the bullying.”

Bloggers Comments: This was orginally published in the Huffington Post  website. I have left the links in tact if you want to go to the petition or the original posting. Please consider signing the petition. It just amazes me that it takes an 11 year old gay boy to bring this to the forefront. And a child shall lead us.... 

Friday, May 24, 2013

Tolerance isn’t good enough

If you want to learn how to measure the vast distance between “tolerance” and “acceptance,” join the Boy Scouts of America. Yesterday, 61% of 1,400 voting members of the BSA’s National Council voted to “remove the restriction denying membership to youth on the basis of sexual orientation alone.”  Before you start writing “thank you” letters though, read on. The official statement, released this afternoon continues, “A change to the current membership policy for adult leaders was not under consideration; thus, the policy for adults remains in place.” 


Homophobia is most dangerous when it has a good editor. What makes the BSA’s statement so galling is how it deftly attempts to sidestep the blatant hatred and disdain of gay people packed in between the lines. Instead of sending a clear message that all boys, gay, straight and in-between, should to be embraced as well as introduced to the kinds of role models BSA is in the business of fashioning, the organization’s National Council has chosen instead to further the idea that gay adults are pariahs and paedophiles.
And so, Boy Scouts can come out as long as they have no desire, at the age of eighteen, to become role models themselves. That’s just about as logical as Canada’s recent decision to end its anti-gay blood donation ban: gay men can donate blood there now, as long as they haven’t had sex with another man in the last five years. In both cases, the subtext is that gay people, ultimately, are dirty – innately & unforgivably. We will be tolerated but not, at least for now, truly welcome. Via BuzzFeed

Bloggers Comments: Well it is a start for sure, and I think over time the National Council of the Boy Scouts of America will come to the conclusion that sexual orientation has no place in the scouting organization. I do not see a fundamental change in the scouting program as their have been gay boys in scouting for years. So we continue on the campaign to get the scouting organization to become truly understanding. That when these boys grown into men, which they will, they still have that love and desire of being a scout. 

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

So much for the bargain bucket: Delivery firm smuggles KFC chicken into Gaza through secret tunnels from Egypt but at three times the normal cost

 

  • Consignments of chicken are smuggled by hand through the illegal supply tunnels beneath the border with Egypt
  • Delivery men face a number of obstacles and dangers, including Hamas inspections, unreliable taxis and the threat of Israeli air strikes
  • Tens of thousands marched today in Gaza to commemorate their expulsion from their homes during the creation of Israel in 1948

By Daniel Miller

PUBLISHED: 11:24 EST, 15 May 2013 | UPDATED: 12:47 EST, 15 May 2013

Fried chicken fans in the Gaza strip have been thrown a lifeline by a delivery company which is smuggling KFC though secret supply tunnels.

The Al-Yamama company is running consignments of the Colonel's secret recipe, carried by hand through a network of tunnels under the border with Egypt.

But buckets of legs, wings and breasts are not such a bargain in the occupied Palestinian territories: it comes at three times the normal cost. 

Taste of freedom: A deliveryman carries bags of KFC food through an underground tunnel beneath the Gaza-Egypt border

Taste of freedom: A deliveryman carries bags of KFC food through an underground tunnel beneath the Gaza-Egypt border

Secret recipe: Portions of KFC fried chicken are now being smuggled into Gaza thanks to an enterprising delivery company

Secret recipe: Portions of KFC fried chicken are now being smuggled into Gaza thanks to an enterprising delivery company

While a family meal costs around £80 Egyptian pounds ($11 U.S.) from the el-Arish KFC restaurant in the Egyptian North Sinai, the price of getting it into Gaza is a further 100 Israeli Shekels ($30).

The delivery company says the higher price is due to the transportation and smuggling fees.

Al-Yamama company accountant Mohammed Al-Madani explained the delivery men face a series of obstacles in bringing the food to Gaza.

These include Hamas security men inspecting the boxes, an unreliable taxi service on the Egyptian side, and the possibility the Israel might send warplanes to bomb the tunnels.

But it seems there is no shortage of punters eager to get their hands on the unique blend of 11 herbs and spices. Luxury: While the price of a KFC family meal is about $11 in Egypt, getting it in Gaza costs a further $30

Luxury: While the price of a KFC family meal is about $11 in Egypt, getting it in Gaza costs a further $30 Demand: Since late last month, Al-Yamama has made four KFC to Palestinians

Demand: Since late last month, Al-Yamama has made four KFC deliveries  to Palestinians

Mr Al-Madanisaid explained how the business started by chance.

'We ordered and arranged to bring some meals for us and they arrive after four hours,' he said.

The company then posted a picture of the fast food on their website, and soon the orders began flooding in.

Since offering the service the late last month, they have made four deliveries of KFC food, each consisting of around two dozen meals.

Aboud Fares, a 22- year-old student, told the Xinhua news agency: 'It's delicious even as it's not hot.'

Fast food deliveries are just one the 1.7million residents of Gaza can keep their spirits up under an occupation which has turned it, in the words of the UN's humanitarian chief, into 'a large open-air prison'.

Bloggers Note: Well this story has nothing to do with anything, other than the fact I found it very interesting. I wonder if anyone would complain if the offered the big bucket minus the bones? Some great commercials in the US about the new boneless chicken at KFC.

I did not run the complete article here, it was about the commemoration service held in the occupied territories. But the link below will take you to the complete article. Feel free to check it out.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2325025/So-bargain-bucket-Delivery-firm-smuggles-KFC-chicken-Gaza-secret-tunnels-Egypt-times-normal-cost.html#ixzz2TPISpJwV
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

May: National Masturbation Month - ENJOY!



May, the sun is shining, the warm wind is blowing and really what more can a person have to say about May. It's National Masturbation Month. The month where all men and women express their sexual desires with their left or right hands.

I am serious, this is a true month to excel in the art of masturbation. Male or female, whether you are jerkin your gherkin, or explore the deep dark hole, at some point your body will respond with a glorious orgasm.

Now for some of us, the month of May isn't reserved just for for that time of personal exploration. For many of us, we can't keep our hands off of our love muscle. But you know their is a medical belief that says masturbation is good for your body. Helps to relieve headaches, the head between your ears, releases endorphins into your body to help relieve pain and stress. The nice thing about masturbation is it doesn't require any additional tools. They are helpful, but just your hand and maybe some lube and you are all set for a joyous time.

Now not to get to far into the process, well okay - let's start with our men folk. they come with the man tool, also know by a lot of different terms, the official terminology is penis. Dick, cock, schlong.. I need not go on. A bit of lube, KY, spit in a desperate situation. However, many men just prefer to wank dry. And the last bit of equipment is a hand.. Left hand, or right hand, which ever feels natural for you. On some rare occasions a partners two feet can make all the difference. 

Now the question is, do I stroke the full length or just the head. A lot of that depends on the most sensual part of your dick. I enjoy a full stroke. And then after that it's just a matter of repeating the up and down motion or the back and forth motion, until you explode. No not literally explode, but your body gets tight, you can't breath and suddenly a wonderful emission from your dick. White and hot and wet. They are known as the little swimmers. In normal sex they would be one half of the baby making process.

Hopefully, you will have the side rag ready to clean up. Paper towel, napkins or tissues are good, but that get's expensive. So a wash cloth works best, can be washed and nobody needs to be the wiser.  They say, 20 minutes of hard work for 2.3 second of ultimate joy.Now sometimes men will masturbation only so far and then stop, they are just trying to extend the time they have with their hard on and their hand. That is called edging. Women do it to. But men are more the master of it I think.

And then after edging, a man must take himself to the final end. He loves that feeling of orgasm and just let's loose.

This is a fun time to celebrate the joy of your human body.

Women have as much fun with their own body. But given that their plumbing is inside they have to go about it a different way. And their results are the same, but less messy if you get my drift. For women it involved reaching into the cave and looking for that one bit of skin which hangs down. And once they find it. Well off they go. And for men we have a hard time knowing if they are really shooting their load as we say. Many times they just fake it. But when they are alone they really do get into it.

Meanwhile, this is the month to express yourself, and I don't mean what you are thinking. But sure, enjoy your body. If it is your first time just remember it is a normal thing to do and has nothing to do with sexual orientation. It's just part of being a human being.

And remember masturbation is not restricted to the month of May, enjoy it all year long. And do it in groups. Or alone. And don't forget it is just a part of being who you are. And you will be amazed how many men and women will agree with you about the ultimate pleasures that masturbation brings them.

Okay the no shirt, no shoes, no pants sign is from a nudist resort. But what better time to express yourself then when you are naked at the beach. (Legalities not withstanding.)

So in honor of the Month of Masturbation, I say put a candle on your special cake -you know the cake with white frosting? Ha Ha. And have fun.